INITIAL CHILD PROTECTION CONFERENCE - 07 November 2013 my paper 22
5.11 Krishna had reported that there was an occasion when she was made to dress up in fancy dress clothing and dance for her mother's friend over the internet via webcam.
I would take many pictutes of Krishna and like all children she used to love to dress up, however this refers to camera pictures as provided in evidence to the court, this feels like some very nasty and malicious insinuation, which quite simply is untrue as I did not have a webcam at the time
Child Protection Intitial Conference, page 2, (reported repetition)Gateshead Children's Service:
Krishna reported to staff that her mother had asked her to put on fancy dress clothes and had been filmed on a webcam for friends of her mother.
Alison Dodds wrote: (...) Krishna reported that her mother made her dress up in fancy dress and dance in front of a video camera for her friends.
Here Alison Dodds changed the words of the Gateteshead Children Service, who also got their facts wrong in relation to this as I will endeavour to prove to the court. Krishna doesn't know how to dance and we didn't have a video camera at that time.
CHILD PROTECTION INITIAL CONFERENCE 07/11/13 my papers 25
page 2-3. Krishna reported to staff that her mother had asked her to put on fancy dress clothes and had been fimed on a webcam for friends of her mother. (...)
Again i did not have a webcam, this was a camera and yes Krishna liked to dress up and have her photograph taken, I have hundreds of pictures of my daughter dressing up, which will be provided in evidence.
5.12 (...) Krishna has shared her modelling pictures on Facebook. This has raised concern that Ms Da Costa is possibly sexually exploiting Krishna.
Krishna has taken professional photo shoot for modeling work, she joined the Spot Light and has a website for the purpose of work, - not sex and of course my daughter shares her photographs, perhaps the Social Worker who wrote this would care to number all the other number of young people who have shared their photographs are they going to be made subject of a care order too? There is nothing wrong with the photographs my daughter has taken. What absolute rubbish.
Give the character statement of Paul, Paula and Peter.
5.37 (Mr Flynn, Head of the Year) There is no concern in relation to Krishna's academic ability. Krishna was described as bright and talented. Outside of school Krishna is involved in activities including Kung fu and music lessons.
Then how come her solicitor said, in court, that is is immature and incapable to know what she wants for her life? This is yet another fabrication on behalf of North Tyneside Social Services.
5.54 Ms Pearson added that, as the heath Visiting Team has been visiting the home on a daily baisis (...) they have observed Krisna's friend from a different school visiting the home on a regular basis.
5.30 Mrs Dodds described Krishna as sad and isolated. Krishna finds it difficult to make friends and her social interactions are very limited.
Another malicious and untrue statement made by the same Social Worker.
page 19-23 of Legal: (Comment upon the consideration of PLO Outline Progress, legal application to Court or any action already taken to safeguard the child/young person) page 17 of 23 -
While it is reported that Krishna has friendship within school these do not appear to extend to outside of these times. (...)
Mrs Dodds has contracdicted Ms Pearson, on several occasions, yet Ms Pearson was visiting me daily.
SOCIAL WORK ASSESSMENT (Alison Dodds)
Birth Family: Parental Capacity, Assessors Comments
7 of 23. Craig reported that Krishna did not speak until she was aged 6 (...) and required intervention from speech and language therapy.(...) on the
CHILD PROTECTION INITIAL CONFERENCE 07/11/13 my papers 25 page 12)
Craig said that Birmingham Social Service said that Krishna didn't speak till the age of 6.
(DENIED AND UNTRUE)
Craig met me in November 2011, my daughter Krishna was already 10 years old. There is no way he could have known how young my daughter was when she began to talk. Consulting the Health Service and first school in Birmingham will disprove this allegation.
Get report from her school in Birmingham stating that she was talking by the age of 4, without any difficulty.
(This report repeats here: CHILD PROTECTION INITIAL CONFERENCE 07/11/13 my papers 25 )
(...) This could potentially place the children at risk from harm and highlights concerns regarding Luci's decision making and prioritisation of the children's needs.